Personal God, really?

I have always wondered when did Jesus decided to establish a “sinners prayers” in order to become one of his follower or when he crated the steps to follow for the way of salvation, better known as “The Roman’s Road”. He never had Bible is his hands, so he could never started that or created those steps in order to go from darkness into life. I just can not see myself going from totally darkness, to totally light after following the Roman’s road, pray the prayer and ZAZ!! you are instantly  becoming a follower of Christ. If I believe that this prayer will be a standard thing to do in order to become a believer, what kind of “personal” god am I believing in? It won’t be personal the moment I follow what others have done. Nobody has ever walked or will ever walk the same road I have done; because nobody could walk in the same shoes I have walked, live the same experiences, battle the same struggles or even see life the way I see it. I have been taught that I am very unique, because there is no other person like me in the entire world; so if I am unique, how come do I have to find God the same way others have? I thought God is more into a personal relationship. So again, if is personal why a prayer or a road has to be standardized for everybody else? If this is my own journey that does not mean I cannot learn from others, I mean from everybody else. Of course I can but at the end it will be my own personal road to walk. Sometimes we are more worry about this “new” people in the faith on how they need to behave, act, and practice “Christianity” that we steal from them the free space to find their own journey and walk their own steps. “This conversion is an inner event that cannot be manipulated but must develop from within. We cannot force anyone to such a personal and intimate change of heart, but we can offer the space where such a change can take place” (Nouwen). In doing so we can let people find their true self by abiding in that higher power called God, Abba, Allah or through out their interaction with others; knowing that every experience will be different. It could be in silence, with contemporary music, with hymns, in church or outside of it, at Sunday school or hanging out and drinking beer with friends, in ancient traditions or modern beliefs.

In the same way I create a welcoming place in my house for everybody to come and be themselves our places where faith is taught need to free spaces to find our personal encounter with spirituality. In my case I teach Christ but by not means I will ask you to change in order to come an fellowship with us, or expect for you to change after coming for a couple of days and listen to the teachings. That is your journey, your walk, your own steps, and do not let anybody tell you how to walk, if they do so, then it wont be a personal but a collective god. My father has eight children and we, each one of us, relate with him differently. When teaching about having a personal relationship with God, let us start living and practice what we taught and let people feel free to find their own journey.

“The real host is the one who offers that space where we do not have to be afraid and where we can listen to our inner voices and find our own personal way of being human. It means inviting the stranger into our world on his or her terms, not ours” (Nouwen)


One thought on “Personal God, really?

Add yours

  1. Miquel,

    I do think that in spiritual conversation, the uniqueness of the other should be highly valued. There is a rote way that the 4 spiritual laws can be presented that does not help a person have an encounter with the almighty. But one must also be careful not to throw out the baby with the bathwater. There is much that humanity holds in common and also there is a spiritual reality revealed through scripture, and with Jesus, seen in the flesh. A part of that spiritual reality is a “way of salvation” that can and should be talked about, but with an eye on the uniquesness of the person. A sign on a Unity church I read said “To Question is the Answer.” It seems the church was interested in promoting a process of discovery rather than the Gospel. (It would not claim to be promoting the Christian Gospel, because that is not within the self-understanding of the Unity church). Most folk will drawn in their sin if all they have is an encouragement in a process. God gave us scripture for a reason. A Henri Nouwen view of the importance of a host providing safety can serve as a portion of a process strategy for the beggar searching for the bread of life, but if the Gospel is not encountered, through the process, the beggar is left hungry for the true bread of life. I think churches need to provide safe places (an embracing love) but in the context, not be shy about proclaiming the Gospel–much of which can be talked about through the way of salvation. In fact, I think people are hungry to hear of a way of salvation that truly leads to “full” salvation. We need to have great love, coupled with a confidence in the Gospel God has worked so hard to bring to us.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Blog at

Up ↑

%d bloggers like this: